Just wanted to check this one as I was asked my opinion in a friendly match last night. After a foul there were two reds on the table, kissing each other on the cushion. Between the white and the reds were two colours. One colour was covering the extreme left edge of the red on the left, another colour was covering the extreme right edge of the red on the right - no argument that the respective edges were covered in this way. There was effectively a full ball shot onto reds from the white because of their kissing each other (a full ball made by two half balls, if you see what I mean). However, I said in my opinion it was a free ball because neither red could be struck at their extreme edges - I assumed their position next to each other was irrelevant in the decision. My opinion carried, but of course there's always that nagging doubt, so please reassure me I was right.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Free ball or not?
Collapse
X
-
you were correct, you dont add two reds to have the extremes
each red is considered individually
see the excellent thread by Statman:
http://www.thesnookerforum.co.uk/boa...f-you-have-oneUp the TSF! :snooker:
-
Originally Posted by misspentoldage View PostJust wanted to check this one as I was asked my opinion in a friendly match last night. After a foul there were two reds on the table, kissing each other on the cushion. Between the white and the reds were two colours. One colour was covering the extreme left edge of the red on the left, another colour was covering the extreme right edge of the red on the right - no argument that the respective edges were covered in this way. There was effectively a full ball shot onto reds from the white because of their kissing each other (a full ball made by two half balls, if you see what I mean). However, I said in my opinion it was a free ball because neither red could be struck at their extreme edges - I assumed their position next to each other was irrelevant in the decision. My opinion carried, but of course there's always that nagging doubt, so please reassure me I was right.
Comment
Comment