I don't think the angle is really on to finish that side of the black and be in perfect position, you'd be better off playing with a bit of left hand side and playing a full ball cannon on the red the opposite side of the black, if you miss it you're still on the black anyway.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Allowing for side
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by Smeeagain View PostId be really interested to know how you created the snooker table image?
MrRottweiler, your guess is as good as mine. Luckily that location is just one of many, so I don't have to stare at it all the time.Last edited by Billy; 25 February 2017, 12:37 AM."Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"
Comment
-
It looks to me like Big Shot got it exactly wrong (50/50 chance here) and vmax got it exactly correct. Since you want to apply right-hand side that will push the cueball to the left and you would cut the red thinner than you intended unless you compensated for that by aiming very slightly thick on this particular pot,
Side is a wonderful thing to help wi\th positioning the cueball but the best advice I can give is to practice with it as much as you can because only experience will teach you the ins and outs. There is no one simple answer because various thing will effectg the amount of side and (let's call it) aim-off to apply to any shot. There's first of all distance between the 2 balls, thickness and nap of the cloth, weight of the cueball, how your own tip plays and also how you own cue plays. All of these factors will change the amount of aim-off for any shot with side-spin.Terry Davidson
IBSF Master Coach & Examiner
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View PostSince you want to apply right-hand side that will push the cueball to the left and you would cut the red thinner than you intended unless you compensated for that by aiming very slightly thick on this particular pot"Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Billy View PostThis makes sense, but perhaps I need to stress that I don't play the game in real life and the question only applies to playing this simulation. It's a very accurate simulation when all's said and done, so any side on the cueball will simulate all the various forces and physics that apply.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View PostIt looks to me like Big Shot got it exactly wrong (50/50 chance here) and vmax got it exactly correct.
Billy
does your computer game recognise your virtual cue/tip/ferrule's deflection as well ?
Comment
-
-
Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View PostIt looks to me like Big Shot got it exactly wrong (50/50 chance here) and vmax got it exactly correct. Since you want to apply right-hand side that will push the cueball to the left and you would cut the red thinner than you intended unless you compensated for that by aiming very slightly thick on this particular pot,
Side is a wonderful thing to help wi\th positioning the cueball but the best advice I can give is to practice with it as much as you can because only experience will teach you the ins and outs. There is no one simple answer because various thing will effectg the amount of side and (let's call it) aim-off to apply to any shot. There's first of all distance between the 2 balls, thickness and nap of the cloth, weight of the cueball, how your own tip plays and also how you own cue plays. All of these factors will change the amount of aim-off for any shot with side-spin.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Billy View PostThis makes sense, but perhaps I need to stress that I don't play the game in real life and the question only applies to playing this simulation. It's a very accurate simulation when all's said and done, so any side on the cueball will simulate all the various forces and physics that apply.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostNo, slightly thinner, at least in theory. Can't see it making much difference if you're only using a little side and you'll probably want to pay more attention to deflection anyway.
Practise it and let the sub conscious decide.Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostLooks to me like the snooker world is still 100% clueless when it comes to simple physics. And the less said about what vmax thinks, the better.Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostThe physics dictate thicker rather than thinner, assuming all other factors (cue ball deflection, nap, weight of cloth etc) are not a concern.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Billy View PostA lot of tapping about in a computer game called Virtual Pool 4, until I got the balls close to how I needed them to illustrate my question.
Smee
Comment
-
Hi Billy. I too do not play real tables, but have played at VP4 for a few months. If you only play the online version, you are at a disadvantage. If you were to purchase the offline game as well, you would have the ability to UNDO your shot and play it again and again. (As well as other good "training aids"...)
The short answer to your question (for VP4, not necessarily real table) is this: If you hit the shot very softly with right side, the white would tend to swerve to the right, making you miss to the left, so to compensate you would aim a bit thinner. If you were to hit with lots of pace (which you would not do in this situation), then the white would deflect (squirt) to the left before any swerve took effect, causing you to miss to the right, so to compensate you would aim thicker.
The distance from white to red is critical, as is the pace of your shot. If you have (or purchase) the home (offline) version of this game, and play the shot 50 times, you will see what I mean. It's not easy!
PS, my name there is Vanwinkle. I only play snooker there. Look for me, let's play a few!
Comment
Comment