Most of us probably couldn't afford a cue as good as most the top players have. Some of their cues look fantastic and make want to have a shot with them. This leads to the question; doe's a really good cue improve the standard of your game?
Then I think of John Spencer with his old cue that was warped and someone described it as looking like 'a dogs leg'. He of course revolutionised the game with his screw back shots and his heavy breakbuilding; with his warped cue.
And Alain Robidoux had an old cue that you think he could have bought from a second-hand shop and when it was smashed he was never the same player again.
So maybe it is what you practise with? I always think that snooker is mostly mental and if you have the belief then you can knock in a century with a pool cue.
Then I think of John Spencer with his old cue that was warped and someone described it as looking like 'a dogs leg'. He of course revolutionised the game with his screw back shots and his heavy breakbuilding; with his warped cue.
And Alain Robidoux had an old cue that you think he could have bought from a second-hand shop and when it was smashed he was never the same player again.
So maybe it is what you practise with? I always think that snooker is mostly mental and if you have the belief then you can knock in a century with a pool cue.
Comment