Brown to Black left on the table and a 'Free ball' has been called. The Brown is in direct line with a pocket and the Black is touching the Brown and is forming a 100% pottable plant. Can you nominate the Black as the Free Ball and thus pot the Brown in the same move or would this be a foul as the Black is the nominated ball and you have potted something else. If it is allowed, does the Brown stay down or is it re-spotted?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Another 'Free ball' question
Collapse
X
-
1. Ok to nominate the Black as Free Ball to pot the Brown. Brown is ball on and is not spotted. Essentially the Black is a brown for the shot. So long as the nominated ball is contacted by the cue ball first; if not Foul.
2. Score 4.
3. Blue now ball on.
4. If both Brown and Black are potted, Brown not spotted, Black is spotted. Score 4 (not 8 )Last edited by DeanH; 31 October 2018, 06:14 PM.Up the TSF! :snooker:
-
Another 'Free ball' question
no, the nominated free ball must be hit by the cue ball first. Not contacting the nominated free ball first is a foul.
As londonlad said, you can simultaneously hit the ball on and nominated free ball.Last edited by DeanH; 15 December 2018, 05:24 PM.Up the TSF! :snooker:
Comment
-
Simultaneously hitting a ball with another ball of the same value is not a foul which is why I was thinking hitting the brown after nominating black in a free ball situation wouldn’t result in a foul as it has the same point value?? I’m definitely no expert on this matter but try to apply a bit of logic where the rules are concerned.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by black21920 View PostSimultaneously hitting a ball with another ball of the same value is not a foul which is why I was thinking hitting the brown after nominating black in a free ball situation wouldn’t result in a foul as it has the same point value?? I’m definitely no expert on this matter but try to apply a bit of logic where the rules are concerned.
How can you name a ball then miss it and expect that to be ok lol
Comment
-
Well there appears no logic to say that it is ok to strike brown and black simultaneously when black is nominated ball and the brown wasn’t, striking another ball simultaneously would normally result in a foul, you haven’t hit the nominated ball first on this occasion hence my reasoning to suggest that hitting the brown after nominating the black would also be ok??
Comment
-
Another 'Free ball' question
the rules state
1. nominated free ball must be hit first
and elsewhere
2. simultaneously hitting two balls is a foul; except two reds, or a ball on and a nominated free ball.
In snooker the free ball must be hit first, in UK pool this is not the case
Where you say "ok to strike brown and black simultaneously when black is nominated ball and the brown wasn’t" is not correct - the brown being ball on is automatically "nominated". So for that strike you in essence have two browns on the table and like multiple reds you can hit two of the same colour simultaneously this stroke only.Last edited by DeanH; 15 December 2018, 06:06 PM.Up the TSF! :snooker:
Comment
-
Originally Posted by DeanH View PostWhere you say "ok to strike brown and black simultaneously when black is nominated ball and the brown wasn’t" is not correct - the brown being ball on is automatically "nominated".Duplicate of banned account deleted
Comment
Comment