Originally Posted by noel
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What causes KICKS?
Collapse
X
-
the balls are TOO slippery wehn you use normal funiture polish, ie pledge etc.
There isn't enough contact made because the balls just slip off each other.
Aramith ball cleaner is best imho.
Seriously, if you want to screw up with someones potting, pledge their balls and watch as they don't pot much.
Comment
-
Does pool have a similar problem with kicks, or is it just snooker?
My (100% untried and untested) theory is that the cueball and object ball are making a double contact. The balls are never rolled in as such, they're always bouncing, but it's unnoticeable to the human eye. When the cueball strikes the object ball, the object ball will be propelled into the bed, rather than perpendicularly to the bed. Therefore, the velocity of the object ball has reduced. Of course, the velocity of the cueball reduces with the collision with the object ball. If the velocity of the cueball after the contact is higher than the velocity of the object ball, then there will be a second contact. This will probably only happen when topspin is used, which is usually when kicks occur in real life. Furthermore, it would explain why pots are missed thick with a kick, because the second contact happens in a different place to the first contact, therefore meaning the pot will be missed. If there is chalk on the table, e.g. if the object ball is resting on some chalk particles, then that would cause the two-contacts.
My "theory" seems to unite all of the possible causes of kicks. :-)
Comment
-
Originally Posted by alexholowczak View PostDoes pool have a similar problem with kicks, or is it just snooker?
My (100% untried and untested) theory is that the cueball and object ball are making a double contact. The balls are never rolled in as such, they're always bouncing, but it's unnoticeable to the human eye. When the cueball strikes the object ball, the object ball will be propelled into the bed, rather than perpendicularly to the bed. Therefore, the velocity of the object ball has reduced. Of course, the velocity of the cueball reduces with the collision with the object ball. If the velocity of the cueball after the contact is higher than the velocity of the object ball, then there will be a second contact. This will probably only happen when topspin is used, which is usually when kicks occur in real life. Furthermore, it would explain why pots are missed thick with a kick, because the second contact happens in a different place to the first contact, therefore meaning the pot will be missed. If there is chalk on the table, e.g. if the object ball is resting on some chalk particles, then that would cause the two-contacts.
My "theory" seems to unite all of the possible causes of kicks. :-)
I would say that chalk or dirt on the balls makes a larger area of contact so that is the reason for balls tending to be missed on the thick side.
Also I think it depends on which ball the chalk or dirt is on. It seems to me that dirty cue ball equals missed pot on the thick side while dirty object ball equals pot not missed but pace on cue ball is slowed dramatically.
To prove any of this certain scenarios would have to be deliberately set up and filmed in super slo mo, until then just instinct and theory.
Comment
Comment