Originally Posted by rambon
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Puzzles with numbers and things
Collapse
X
-
-
Berolina now has it right as well so I'l post the answer hidden here for those who want to check it.
Chim broke off and went in-off the pack, which meant that Gor lead 0-4
Gor potted a red (rules say the next shot was missed) 0-5
Chim potted a red (rules say the next shot was missed) 1-5
Reds are now alternately potted by each player (missing the colour each time) until the score reaches Chim 7 Gor 12
Chim has a go at the yellow first, which he pots to make it 9-12, but he misses the green (miss 1) and Gor misses the green (miss 2 = value of yellow). Chim therefore pots the green to make it 12-12
Chim, Gor and Chim (3 times = value of green) miss the brown before Gor pots it: 12-16
Gor, Chim, Gor and Chim (4 times = value of brown) miss the blue before Gor pots it: 12-21
Gor, Chim, Gor, Chim and Gor (5 times = value of blue) miss the pink before Chim pots it: 18-21
Chim, Gor, Chim, Gor, Chim and Gor (6 times = value of pink) miss the black before Chim pots it: 25-21
So the final score is Chim Pan Zee 25 Gor Illa 21
Leave a comment:
-
Congratulations to snookersfun who got the right answer (eventually!!!). Will leave it open for a while though to see if anyone else gets there
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by davis_greatestThis of course is the easier way. Congratulations also to April Madness and to snookersfun. rambon, did you get any other answers to be congratulated?
A quick one for you all now. The final of the tournament, saw Chim Pan Zee (a primate from China) play Gor Illa (an Albanian primate). Every time a ball was potted, bizarrely, the value of the ball equalled the number of the next shots to be taken without potting a ball). Chim Pan Zee broke, and went in-off the pack, and Gor Illa potted a red with his first shot. Given that no more fouls occurred and no-one potted more than one ball at a time, who won the frame and by what score?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by berolinaWell, I'm not used to playing snooker with apes...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by rambonALTERNATIVE SOLUTION
In an ideal world, we would have 4096 apes (2 to power 12), which would mean we could have 2048, then 1024.
So we simply subtract 3604 from 4096 and get 492
Leave a comment:
-
492 is the correct answer, and there are a few ways of doing it.
We need 2048 people in the next round, which means we need to lose 3604-2048 apes, or 1556. This means we have to have 1556 matches, which will require 3112 apes.
Therefore we do not require 3604 -3112 apes, or 492
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION
In an ideal world, we would have 4096 apes (2 to power 12), which would mean we could have 2048, then 1024.
So we simply subtract 3604 from 4096 and get 492
Leave a comment:
-
Congratulations berolina!
So here, with new joiner berolina, is the latest Puzzles with numbers and things Hall of Frame
Oliver (my pet orang-utan)
Gordon (my pet gorilla)
Charlie (my pet chimpanzee)
snookersfun
abextra
davis_greatest (Oliver's, Gordon's and Charlie's pet something)
Vidas
chasmmi
elvaago
robert602
Sarmu
The Statman
austrian_girl
austrian_girl's dad
Semih_Sayginer
Snooker Rocks!
Ginger_Freak
April Madness
steveb72
rambon
Microsoft Excel
dantuck_7
berolina
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by rambonDon't worry about it... You were on the right lines, but you just need to think one step further.....
I can't think right now...I guess I have to leave this thread in shame...my maths days are over...I'll go to the zoo tomorrow...my last guess is 492.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by berolinaWell, I'm not used to playing snooker with apes...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by rambonSorry Berolina, and easy mistake to make but that's incorrect
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by berolinaYou should change the name of the thread to puzzles with numbers and apes...anyway my guess is 1556.
Leave a comment:
-
You should change the name of the thread to puzzles with numbers and apes...anyway my guess is 1556.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by davis_greatestHeheNo, the toilet is smaller than the house. If we'd used the whole house, we could have had 12,988,816 apes.
Usual rules apply. Private me if you know the answer and are on the hall of fame, if you're not, answer here.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: