Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Puzzles with numbers and things

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by elvaago
    Because everyone will see in your example that square root of -1 is wrong, but if you confuse them with i most people will be confused. :-)
    I am not taking square root of -1... what I meant was

    -1 = square root of [ (-1) squared ] = square root of [1] = 1

    Leave a comment:


  • elvaago
    replied
    Because everyone will see in your example that square root of -1 is wrong, but if you confuse them with i most people will be confused. :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Why mess around with i? With that logic, you could just as well say:

    -1 = square root of (-1) squared = square root of 1 = 1

    Leave a comment:


  • elvaago
    replied
    I'm not especially bright today, I'll take your word for it. I'll finish with the following gem, though:

    Assuming that there is a number i for which goes i^2 = -1 you can deduce the following:

    -1 = i^2 = i * i = square root of -1 * square root of -1 = square root of (-1 * -1) = square root of (-1^2) = square root of 1 = 1

    Therefore, -1 = 1

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Are you satisfied with the question and answer now, elvaago and rambon?

    Leave a comment:


  • snookersfun
    replied
    Haha, of course not. Why would I have had a range otherwise?
    got to the 10 in about the same way (only possibility to get same # of digits), after that figures that the number has to be around 9.9 (bit smaller in fact), therefore 2nd answer 98 and third 970 (as really tiny numbers are added to those, they couldn't have been the next highest numbers)

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by snookersfun
    I feel smoking heads... and I don't feel so silly anymore
    Hehe. Did you solve it the same way?

    Leave a comment:


  • snookersfun
    replied
    I feel smoking heads... and I don't feel so silly anymore

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by elvaago
    Why are you subtracting 2 and 30 from respectively 100 and 1000? I don't see anywhere in your problem that you have to deduct anything from anything.
    What we know is that Charlie tells davis_greatest a Special Number S, which I add to its reciprocal to get
    S + 1/S. Call this answer "Davis".

    Charlie tells Gordon the square of the special number S^2, which Gordon adds to its reciprocal to get
    S^2 + 1/S^2. Call this answer "Gordon".

    Charlie tells Oliver the cube of the special number S^3, which Oliver adds to its reciprocal to get
    S^3 + 1/S^3. Call this answer "Oliver".

    With some algebra (shown above) - regardless of the value of the special number S - you get:

    Gordon = Davis^2 – 2

    and

    Oliver = Davis^3 - 3 x Davis.

    That's why you don't need a calculator - because at the end all you need to calculate is
    10 x 10 x 10 - 3 x 10 = 1000 - 30 = 970.

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by elvaago
    I think he means that S + 1/S = 10, where S is not 10, but more something like, 9.89.
    Precisely. You don't have to know the Special Number S to solve the problem. But in fact S + 1/S = 10, so S could be either about 9.899 or about 0.101.

    Leave a comment:


  • elvaago
    replied
    I think he means that S + 1/S = 10, where S is not 10, but more something like, 9.89.

    Leave a comment:


  • rambon
    replied
    You've lost me for the first time I think.

    If you add the reciprocal of 10 (1/10) to 10, you get 10.1 don't you? Why is that a whole number. I've just spent eight hours on a plane, so I admit that jetlag might have played a role in this.....

    Leave a comment:


  • elvaago
    replied
    Why are you subtracting 2 and 30 from respectively 100 and 1000? I don't see anywhere in your problem that you have to deduct anything from anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    snookersfun extends her lead

    Originally Posted by snookersfun
    hopefully 970, after a bit more thought.
    970 is the correct answer. Well done!

    Let S = the Special Number

    and davis_greatest’s answer be Davis = S + 1/S
    and Gordon’s answer be Gordon = S^2 + 1/S^2
    and Oliver’s answer be Oliver = S^3 + 1/S^3

    Then Davis^2 = (S + 1/S)^2 = S^2 + 1/S^2 + 2 = Gordon + 2
    So Gordon = Davis^2 – 2

    Gordon has the same number of digits as Davis.
    Davis has more than one digit, so Davis >=10
    If Davis = 10, the Gordon = 10^2 – 2 = 100 – 2 =98 which has the same number of digits as Davis.
    If Davis>=11, then Gordon = Davis^2 – 2 has more digits than Davis.

    So Davis = 10.

    Once we know this, there is more than one way of getting Oliver’s answer. One way is to note that
    Davis^3 = (S + 1/S)^3 = S^3 + 1/S^3 + 3S + 3/S = Oliver + 3 Davis

    So Oliver = Davis^3 – 3 Davis = 10^3 – 3x10 = 1000 – 30 = 970



    SO HERE IS THE SCOREBOARD AFTER ROUND 31

    snookersfun……………………….…..15
    Vidas……………………………………….8½
    robert602…………………………………5
    abextra……………………………..…...4½
    davis_greatest…………………..……3

    (some rounds may be worth more than one point)
    (especially ones won by davis_greatest)

    Leave a comment:


  • elvaago
    replied
    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X