Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Snooker's Biggest Quiz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alex0paul
    replied
    This is bugging me, i really want to know the answer!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert602
    replied
    On second thoughts, that probably wouldn't be a 'miss' either, would it?

    Hmm, puzzling.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert602
    replied
    Miscued 5 times in a row, causing an illegal jumpshot but fluking the yellow every time. Each time the balls were replaced.

    Again, not technically a pot but worth a try maybe?

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by chasmmi
    Round Forty-Nine

    In the first round match johnny cueless is seen to pot the yellow clean of its spot five times in a row without his opponent ever coming to the table and any other balls moving.

    How did this happen?
    Should "five times in a row" be assumed to mean that these are 5 consecutive shots (i.e. with no intervening shots)?

    If - say - he knocks in the yellow and the white also goes in, would you count this as a "pot"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex0paul
    replied
    The ref and the opponent might be blind and the player pots 5 yellows to con the ref and opponent that he has cleared the colours?

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    chasmmi, I assume the referee has not made any errors?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex0paul
    replied
    He may shout something

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by Alex0paul
    He was snookered and kept missing the intended ball by potting the yellow 5 times?
    This would not be a "pot". A pot must be "when an object ball ... enters a pocket... without any infringement of [the] Rules". But, chasmmi, would you include this sort of situation to be a "pot" in your question?

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Originally Posted by Alex0paul
    The yellow is potted as a free ball followed by another yellow. Then the other player fouls in some way that he creates another free ball. The yellow is used as the free ball followed by another yellow. Then another yellow is potted at the start of a clearance.
    ???????
    I thought of something like that but surely there would be a red to pot first (before the "yellow at the start of the cleaance") if he is potting free ball and then yellow, twice.

    And how does the opponent foul without coming to the table? Throws something at the ball marker while the referee is cleaning the cue ball? (Per The Statman's suggestion at a question I asked on the BBC site a couple of days ago!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex0paul
    replied
    The yellow is potted as a free ball followed by another yellow. Then the other player fouls in some way that he creates another free ball. The yellow is used as the free ball followed by another yellow. Then another yellow is potted at the start of a clearance.
    ???????

    Leave a comment:


  • davis_greatest
    replied
    Can I clarify:

    a) Do you mean that the cue ball and the yellow ball moved, but in between the 1st pot and the 5th pot on the yellow, no other balls moved?

    b) Do you mean "pot" in the usual sense of a legal pot, or are you including the sense where the yellow enters the pocket but where it might be a foul?

    Leave a comment:


  • chasmmi
    replied
    I admit that's possible but it's not what happened here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex0paul
    replied
    He was snookered and kept missing the intended ball by potting the yellow 5 times?

    Leave a comment:


  • chasmmi
    replied
    good Idea but no it was snooker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex0paul
    replied
    they were actually playing pool?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X