Robertson and Maguire have not joined the players who have done "this" twice. :smile:
For 3 points:
A full list of players who have done this should help, including everyone who has only done it one time. Since the year 2000 we have Graeme Dott, Stephen Lee, Stephen Magurire, Neil Robertson, Ricky Walden, Marco Fu and Barry Hawkins. In the 90s we had Terry Griffiths (2x), Steve James and Darren Morgan. In the 80s we had Kirk Stevens, Bill Werbeniuk, Eddie Charlton (3x), Tony Knowles, David Taylor, Ray Reardon (2x), Dennis Taylor and Terry Griffiths. And in the 70s we just had Rex Williams. :smile: I hope I haven't left anyone out.
Can you find the pattern?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The common link
Collapse
X
-
For 4 points:
Since Hawkins did win two frames yesterday, he did not join Charlton, Reardon and Griffiths in that group of players who have done "something" at the Crucible on more than one occasion. Looking through the players that are still in the tournament, I see that Robertson and Maguire could theoretically join that group this year. For Robertson it would be very unlikely though, and Maguire would need to reach at least the SF to have any chance at all. :smile:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by JimMalone View PostI guess it has something to do with
a) losing frames in a row. Hawkins had some really dry spells. He lost 8 in a row against O'Sullivan in 2014 (and would so against Wilson if he fails to win another one) as well as 7 in a row to Higgins and Murphy.
Griffiths lost 9 in a row to Hendry in 1989 7 to Davis in 1980.
or b) losing xx of the last xx frames multiple times.
Leave a comment:
-
I guess it has something to do with
a) losing frames in a row. Hawkins had some really dry spells. He lost 8 in a row against O'Sullivan in 2014 (and would so against Wilson if he fails to win another one) as well as 7 in a row to Higgins and Murphy.
Griffiths lost 9 in a row to Hendry in 1989 7 to Davis in 1980.
or b) losing xx of the last xx frames multiple times.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by JimMalone View PostDoesn't win a frame in the final session of his match for the second (or third, if you include the 2014 semi, where he already lost after three sessions) time?
But I would be imagine there would be more players.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Odrl View PostIf Barry Hawkins failed to win another frame tomorrow (leading Kyren Wilson 9-7 as I type this), he would become the fourth player, after Eddie Charlton, Ray Reardon and Terry Griffiths, to do what at the Crucible?
This is so delightfully obscure and ridiculous that I will give you another couple of hints... It has something to with matches of at least three sessions, and the three players mentioned are the only ones who have done something very particular on more than one occasion at the Crucible. What is it? :smile:) time?
But I would be imagine there would be more players.
Leave a comment:
-
If Barry Hawkins failed to win another frame tomorrow (leading Kyren Wilson 9-7 as I type this), he would become the fourth player, after Eddie Charlton, Ray Reardon and Terry Griffiths, to do what at the Crucible?
This is so delightfully obscure and ridiculous that I will give you another couple of hints... It has something to with matches of at least three sessions, and the three players mentioned are the only ones who have done something very particular on more than one occasion at the Crucible. What is it? :smile:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Mark187187 View PostLisowski/Jimmy Robertson (135) for tbe European Masters
Current standings:
1. cantpotforshĂte - 7 points
2. Mark187187 - 4 points
3. JimMalone - 3 points
I think I'll stop with these for a while now, as the last couple were fairly uninspired. :smile:
Leave a comment:
-
Michael Georgiou (109) if we count the 2018 shoot out, then Lisowski/Jimmy Robertson (135) for tbe European Masters
Leave a comment:
-
Okay, for 1 point:
The sequence is about players who have won the highest break prize in a ranking event with a break lower than 140.
Can you name the "?" we are looking for? :smile:
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: