Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ssb - fast, furious and fun: The shootout reviewed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ssb - fast, furious and fun: The shootout reviewed

    “Better than Power Snooker” was my view of the new Caesarcasino.com Shootout after Friday’s afternoon session – not exactly the biggest compliment you could pay.

    By this afternoon my opinion had been upgraded to “better than expected” but tonight’s session won me over. There was some genuine drama at a rocking Tower Circus in Blackpool.

    Mike Dunn displayed a steely nerve to see off Alfie Burden on the black. Rory McLeod outrageously fluked the black to beat Tony Drago in the dying seconds. And then Neil Robertson, with one second to spare, struck the cue ball to pot the black and beat Alan McManus.

    What we’ve also seen is how good these players are. I thought the super-fast shot clock may result in farce but, in fact, the players have adapted.

    I’d argue it’s done the slow players a favour: there is no time to look for what can go wrong.

    Ball in hand has cut out rolling up behind colours but it also puts pressure on the player who receives it: it’s up to them to make the most of it and not all have.

    The Shootout has not replaced a tournament. It is a new addition to the circuit, designed to give Sky a distinct event.

    Once upon a time they bid tens of millions for the World Championship but were turned down (the fact that the then WPBSA board included several BBC commentators was surely a coincidence).

    Sky doesn’t want the scraps of the circuit and so it’s entirely understandable that if they are to show anything then they desire something out of leftfield, which Barry Hearn has dreamt up.

    Sky’s first rate production values and varied commentary team have done a great job of bringing across the atmosphere.

    And the venue is superb. It’s a bear-pit similar to Goffs, the long time venue of the Irish Masters and would make an ideal home for a tournament like the Masters.

    There are elements of the Shootout I don’t like. By and large, the crowd add to the atmosphere but there are inevitably a few ‘comedians’ who, emboldened by drink, shout out all manner of boorish witticisms that add nothing whatsoever to the viewing experience. Hats off to referee Michaela Tabb for asking for a bit of decorum tonight.

    I could quite cheerfully never hear that American voiceover guy again and the whole thing probably went on too long.

    So I’ve enjoyed the Shootout on the whole but the one thing I hope is that there isn’t a kneejerk reaction from people within the game – particularly players – that this format should be flogged to death or even introduced for ranking events.

    It works as a one off, a piece of entertainment to enjoy once a year, but that’s as far as it goes.

    Naturally it’s not for everyone, although a number of those who took against the Shootout have nevertheless kept watching it, presumably so that they can be mortally offended all weekend.

    There is a new ranking event starting on Wednesday and two new ones next season, so those lamenting the death of the game are well wide of the mark.

    Opinions will differ, but Hearn looks like he’s unearthed another winner.

    As Ali Carter put it: “It’s a bit of fun, that’s how the players are treating it.”

    Bearing in mind what else is going on in the world, what is really wrong with that?


    More...

  • #2
    I was scepticle of it before it started but I have to say its been a breath of fresh air. I'm sure this event will and should be carried forward each season, possibly with a tweaking maybe make it a best of 3 and carry ranking points. I certainly think it has a place on the calendar and I doubt too many of the players would oppose it.

    What has made it great is the atmosphere, we've not seen this in snooker before and its actually bringing out the best in some of the players. Let the fun continue.

    Comment


    • #3
      Enjoyed tonight's matches. Genuine excitement caused by thrilling matches.
      This could work, if the organisers don't rely on the girls, music and silly voice announcements to provide the atmosphere. Only the snooker can do that.
      Oh, and that's a bad miss.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally Posted by nevets View Post
        Enjoyed tonight's matches. Genuine excitement caused by thrilling matches.
        This could work, if the organisers don't rely on the girls, music and silly voice announcements to provide the atmosphere. Only the snooker can do that.
        i enjoyed the action then Ken bloody Doherty opened his fat hole and Suggested Ball in Hand could work in Normal events at that point i switched the thing off.

        EVERY Time some cretin does that with these new Innovations and think this could work in proper Snooker.

        NO KEN PILLOCK IT CANT.

        Comment


        • #5
          I was sceptical of how well this would work but I really enjoyed it with some games providing some edge of the seat entertainment.

          Only downsides I found were the dick heads shouting out when players were on the shot and phones could be heard ringing too, the OTT announcer with the 'Shot clock' restrictions could be done away with and replaced with a sound or just '20 seconds' etc.

          I can see it getting to big for it's current location so it would be good to see it at different venues in future.

          The ball in hand and touching cushion rule worked well and I wonder how long before a blue ball decider?

          I think there should be a prize for a 147 and another for a highest break up to and including 146.

          Comment

          Working...
          X