Originally Posted by magicman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ssb - mount responds to spa criticism
Collapse
X
-
His other business's make plenty for SWSA to run for a while yet. But as he said, he wants to try and get it to break even asap.
Re the food, there is a kitchen but a 'chef' costs alot more per year than would be clawed back in food sales. I remember you saying you'd eaten a rileys burger before, the food currently on offer at SWSA is 100 times better than than ****.
Its a snooker club, not a cafe. If you want something other than a toastie or whatever, go to the pub 5 minutes walk away, or the KFC/McDonalds/Tesco 5 minutes drive away. Food should not be an issue.Unclevit C Brand - CueGuru Tip.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Deepscrew View PostHis other business's make plenty for SWSA to run for a while yet. But as he said, he wants to try and get it to break even asap.
Re the food, there is a kitchen but a 'chef' costs alot more per year than would be clawed back in food sales. I remember you saying you'd eaten a rileys burger before, the food currently on offer at SWSA is 100 times better than than ****.
Its a snooker club, not a cafe. If you want something other than a toastie or whatever, go to the pub 5 minutes walk away, or the KFC/McDonalds/Tesco 5 minutes drive away. Food should not be an issue.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by cazmac1 View PostI'm going to pm Paul and ask him to respond.
The reality is that the majority (not all) of players at that time preferred to visit the local takeaways or restaurants to get food that they recognised and ate regularly as opposed to eat at SWSA. This is of course no problem and having made a loss on the catering at that event, we decided to offer a limited range of snack based items. We are however more than happy to listen to feedback and will possibly try a few more items on our menu for future events to access their popularity and feasibility for the long term. What we won't do however is create meals at a loss for the minority-it just isn't feasible both in terms of costs and staff.
I hope that goes a little way to answering the question.
I would like to also add that the support on this thread is very much appreciated. If anyone ever doubted that our involvement in snooker was out of genuine interest in the sport, I think having seen the figures mentioned over the past couple of days may reassure them that we are not in this for the money!
Many thanks,
Sarahwww.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Postparticle:
Just so you don't get the wrong idea. The pros have one room upstairs with 4 tables especially reserved for them while the other players use the other two rooms.
So you can't say play on a table next to a couple of pros practicing. I'm not sure, but I don't think you can hang around all day and watch the pros even though there is some seating in their room as I would figure the SWSA would like you to get a table.
TerryJanie Watkins
On Q Promotions / South West Snooker Academy
All views are my own and in no way represent On Q or the Academy
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Sarah Mount View PostPaul doesn't come on here so I hope you don't mind me replying on his behalf. The point you make about trying to make money off a better selection of food is very valid and is in fact something we have already tried. At a previous event (I forget which one) we offered meals such as chilli con carne, chicken curry, rice, salad etc and some other things that I can't remember. You would not believe the amount of waste we were left with. We were cautious with the number of portions we catered for and made informed decisions on costs/pricing/portion sizes/portion numbers etc but alas we sold very few meals and it was fair to say that sales were disappointing, despite those who bought meals being very happy with the quality.
The reality is that the majority (not all) of players at that time preferred to visit the local takeaways or restaurants to get food that they recognised and ate regularly as opposed to eat at SWSA. This is of course no problem and having made a loss on the catering at that event, we decided to offer a limited range of snack based items. We are however more than happy to listen to feedback and will possibly try a few more items on our menu for future events to access their popularity and feasibility for the long term. What we won't do however is create meals at a loss for the minority-it just isn't feasible both in terms of costs and staff.
I hope that goes a little way to answering the question.
I would like to also add that the support on this thread is very much appreciated. If anyone ever doubted that our involvement in snooker was out of genuine interest in the sport, I think having seen the figures mentioned over the past couple of days may reassure them that we are not in this for the money!
Many thanks,
SarahLast edited by Particle Physics; 31 July 2012, 08:36 PM.Harder than you think is a beautiful thing.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Sarah Mount View PostPaul doesn't come on here so I hope you don't mind me replying on his behalf. The point you make about trying to make money off a better selection of food is very valid and is in fact something we have already tried. At a previous event (I forget which one) we offered meals such as chilli con carne, chicken curry, rice, salad etc and some other things that I can't remember. You would not believe the amount of waste we were left with. We were cautious with the number of portions we catered for and made informed decisions on costs/pricing/portion sizes/portion numbers etc but alas we sold very few meals and it was fair to say that sales were disappointing, despite those who bought meals being very happy with the quality.
The reality is that the majority (not all) of players at that time preferred to visit the local takeaways or restaurants to get food that they recognised and ate regularly as opposed to eat at SWSA. This is of course no problem and having made a loss on the catering at that event, we decided to offer a limited range of snack based items. We are however more than happy to listen to feedback and will possibly try a few more items on our menu for future events to access their popularity and feasibility for the long term. What we won't do however is create meals at a loss for the minority-it just isn't feasible both in terms of costs and staff.
I hope that goes a little way to answering the question.
I would like to also add that the support on this thread is very much appreciated. If anyone ever doubted that our involvement in snooker was out of genuine interest in the sport, I think having seen the figures mentioned over the past couple of days may reassure them that we are not in this for the money!
Many thanks,
Sarah
Good luck and hopefully I will pay you a visit soon.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Particle Physics View PostGood luck to you all up there; snooker really needs you. I hope to get some lads up there soon, to see you all in the flesh, for a day on great tables.www.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
Originally Posted by cazmac1 View PostHi thank you for your response, first off let me say that I have nothing but respect for what your doing and I hope you can turn the corner and get the club operating at a no loss very soon. With regards to the food I was merely expanding on the points raised in the OP. You have more than satisfied me with your answer, if you have given it a go and it didn't work out then you have done all you can and I would not expect you to repeat the experiment. It seems that there are a few players that just like to moan, I bet the ones moaning were the ones getting the take away's.
Good luck and hopefully I will pay you a visit soon.www.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
Originally Posted by the legend View PostThe interesting thing for me in Paul Mounts letter was him stating that the academy is losing 120 thousand pound per year...
£120,000 opex is not the same as losing £120k per year.
There is no mention of how much profit or loss the academy actually makes except that it says MR Mount would like to see it make a profit or at least break even
So from that we can assume it is not breaking even at the moment, but it is not running a loss of £120K/annum - or I sincerely hope notUp the TSF! :snooker:
Comment
-
Sarah, many thanks for taking the time to reply on this thread ... I'm sure we'd all like to thank you and your dad for providing such a great facility and wish both of you and all of the other staff at the SWSA the very best for it's continuing success
Comment
-
Originally Posted by DandyA View PostSarah, many thanks for taking the time to reply on this thread ... I'm sure we'd all like to thank you and your dad for providing such a great facility and wish both of you and all of the other staff at the SWSA the very best for it's continuing successHarder than you think is a beautiful thing.
Comment
Comment