If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm not up to speed on legal jargon, but is this saying the appeal is not going well, and that he has to pay another £30,000 so far ???
Jeez those Solicitors must get a canny wedge of pay !!!
I'm not up to speed on legal jargon, but is this saying the appeal is not going well, and that he has to pay another £30,000 so far ???
Jeez those Solicitors must get a canny wedge of pay !!!
Aye it's not a bad job when you can get a few hundred pound an hour just for thinking time!!, you don't even have to do anything but if your thinking about a case you can charge for it.
That doesn't sound good at all for Stephen Lee. Being called untrustworthy is very very strong language in those circles.
Last edited by itsnoteasy; 13 March 2014, 07:30 PM.
Aye it's not a bad job when you can get a few hundred pound an hour just for thinking time!!, you don't even have to do anything but if your thinking about a case you can charge for it.
That doesn't sound good at all for Stephen Lee. Being called untrustworthy is very very strong language in those circles.
Thinking is, and thoroughly deserves to be, amongst the highest paid of activities. If everyone could do it, it would be less expensive.
Watched a programme on the tv once, many years ago, a lawyer was getting the train into work, read the paper, had a little kip, ate something, looked out of the window for ten minutes , billed his client £175 , as he said he was thinking about his case as he stared out the window, lol.
I'm not up to speed on legal jargon, but is this saying the appeal is not going well, and that he has to pay another £30,000 so far ???
Jeez those Solicitors must get a canny wedge of pay !!!
Since the first part of the appeal alleged that members of the board were biased has been dismissed, the committee has decided that Lee should pay some of the legal costs because he wasted everyone's time. All we know is that first part of the appeal was an allegation that some of the members of board or the investigators, I can't remember who, were biased in the previous hearing. In other words, he thinks they are out to get him. They have dismissed that part of the appeal. The most important part, did he or didn't fix matches, will be come up soon.
Watched a programme on the tv once, many years ago, a lawyer was getting the train into work, read the paper, had a little kip, ate something, looked out of the window for ten minutes , billed his client £175 , as he said he was thinking about his case as he stared out the window, lol.
well at least he didn't have a poo ... god knows how much that costs the client
Watched a programme on the tv once, many years ago, a lawyer was getting the train into work, read the paper, had a little kip, ate something, looked out of the window for ten minutes , billed his client £175 , as he said he was thinking about his case as he stared out the window, lol.
Watched a programme on the tv once, many years ago, a lawyer was getting the train into work, read the paper, had a little kip, ate something, looked out of the window for ten minutes , billed his client £175 , as he said he was thinking about his case as he stared out the window, lol.
Comment