Hi All.
I've just played the Masters and got kicked out after the my first round victory, ronnie won the tournament, i got 1750 points and 6.000 prize money.
However, I think I've figured it out, next year I'll be able to win the tournament because only the top 8 are allowed into the quarter final and beyond stages, this way you can play the Masters qualifier (as in to unlock the venue in versus mode) but not the rest of the tournament due to not been ranked in the top 8.
I was ranked 9th at the time, the same thing happened in the Pot Black Cup, I'm convinced that as the snooker ranking system in real life only allows top 8 players to play in invitational events, the top 16 gets you a match to unlock the qualifier venue and a top 8 ranking is needed to win the tournament.
Does this make sense to anyone else, I'll definitely be inside the top 8 at the start of next season, it'll be interesting to test this theory out in due course!
I've just played the Masters and got kicked out after the my first round victory, ronnie won the tournament, i got 1750 points and 6.000 prize money.
However, I think I've figured it out, next year I'll be able to win the tournament because only the top 8 are allowed into the quarter final and beyond stages, this way you can play the Masters qualifier (as in to unlock the venue in versus mode) but not the rest of the tournament due to not been ranked in the top 8.
I was ranked 9th at the time, the same thing happened in the Pot Black Cup, I'm convinced that as the snooker ranking system in real life only allows top 8 players to play in invitational events, the top 16 gets you a match to unlock the qualifier venue and a top 8 ranking is needed to win the tournament.
Does this make sense to anyone else, I'll definitely be inside the top 8 at the start of next season, it'll be interesting to test this theory out in due course!
Comment