I have often wondered about the differences in what snooker cues are available to buy. I'm sure that the more 'snooker savvy' members will put me right here. My questions are :-
What is the real difference in the quality of a cue costing say £100.00 to one that a good amateur or pro would use (I have no idea what the cost of one of these would be). As far as I know, most of them are made from the same type of wood. Most of them are of similar length give or take an inch or so and, most of them have a tip of around the 9 or 10 mm mark. The overall weight of cues seem to fall into similar figures, varying mainly by only the odd ounce or two. The butt diameter doesn't seem to vary much either. Can you really tell if the butt has been machine or hand-spliced and does it really matter?
If you looked at two cues side by side, one from each end of the price spectrum, can you tell the difference just from the visual aspect and, how can you tell?
Is a one-piece cue better than a two piece (most pro's seem to use a one-piece I think) and, is a two-thirds split better than a fifty-fifty split and, if there is a difference, what would make either one of these better than the other?
I realise that most of the top pro's would almost certainly have their cue tailor made and would probably spend hours playing with it and having it 'fine tuned' until they felt that it was just right. This is probably not a practical option for your average club/league player so, how do they spend there hard earned cash wisely on choosing a cue?
I didn't start playng until I retired at 65. I'm 82 now and can knock in breaks of between 25 to 35 with the odd 40+ and have recently had a couple of 50+ers, which I'm more than pleased about. My big problem is consistency.
So the final question is, what are the chances of my game improving if I treated myself to a decent cue and, as above, how do I tell a good 'un from an average one?
Apologies if these seem like stupid questions but I am an old wrinkley now.
What is the real difference in the quality of a cue costing say £100.00 to one that a good amateur or pro would use (I have no idea what the cost of one of these would be). As far as I know, most of them are made from the same type of wood. Most of them are of similar length give or take an inch or so and, most of them have a tip of around the 9 or 10 mm mark. The overall weight of cues seem to fall into similar figures, varying mainly by only the odd ounce or two. The butt diameter doesn't seem to vary much either. Can you really tell if the butt has been machine or hand-spliced and does it really matter?
If you looked at two cues side by side, one from each end of the price spectrum, can you tell the difference just from the visual aspect and, how can you tell?
Is a one-piece cue better than a two piece (most pro's seem to use a one-piece I think) and, is a two-thirds split better than a fifty-fifty split and, if there is a difference, what would make either one of these better than the other?
I realise that most of the top pro's would almost certainly have their cue tailor made and would probably spend hours playing with it and having it 'fine tuned' until they felt that it was just right. This is probably not a practical option for your average club/league player so, how do they spend there hard earned cash wisely on choosing a cue?
I didn't start playng until I retired at 65. I'm 82 now and can knock in breaks of between 25 to 35 with the odd 40+ and have recently had a couple of 50+ers, which I'm more than pleased about. My big problem is consistency.
So the final question is, what are the chances of my game improving if I treated myself to a decent cue and, as above, how do I tell a good 'un from an average one?
Apologies if these seem like stupid questions but I am an old wrinkley now.
Comment