All depends entirely on what you're looking for in a snooker match...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2014 World Championship - Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by wake_up_bomb View PostJust to put the standard of play into context, I was looking at the 1985 World Championships today, I was just interested in looking up the frame scores in the final.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_Wo...r_Championship
There were fourteen century breaks in the entire tournament. No-one apart from Steve Davis made more than two. Ray Reardon reached the semi-finals and didn't make one all tournament. There were no centuries in the final. There were only two breaks of over 130 in the entire tournament.
We are spoiled today, we just don't realise it.Steve Davis Technical Articles = https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...ilebasic?pli=1
Comment
-
Originally Posted by wake_up_bomb View PostJust to put the standard of play into context, I was looking at the 1985 World Championships today, I was just interested in looking up the frame scores in the final.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_Wo...r_Championship
There were fourteen century breaks in the entire tournament. No-one apart from Steve Davis made more than two. Ray Reardon reached the semi-finals and didn't make one all tournament. There were no centuries in the final. There were only two breaks of over 130 in the entire tournament.
We are spoiled today, we just don't realise it.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hinzy9 View PostWhat are you looking for? Small breaks? If so your more than welcome to come and watch me!
I'm always looking for tension and drama in a snooker match. Close fought battles, mistakes are fine as well...as long as the players are still up for the fight. Chess with balls. I don't care for just big breaks and I despise one-sided matches.
Not too much to ask for really now is it
Comment
Comment